I don't want to cut into Mr. McColeman's question, but in one of the paragraphs, you said, and I think this builds on what Mr. McColeman said, “It is also worth noting that during implementation of the new process, the Government has decided to make appointments or re-appointments to positions that are essential for the good governance or continuity of government business that may not include the full set of new measures announced this year.”
When we read something like that, it might be easy to say here's the new process. We have the process, but because the government wants continuity of government policy and government business, they're just going to appoint whomever. Is that fair?