Again, I don't want to put words in the Auditor General's mouth.
Auditor General, correct me if I get this wrong. There was in fact costing on an initiative-by-initiative basis, project by project, within each department. I don't think there's a dispute about that. I think the breakdown was in the way in which it was reported across the initiative, across the 17 or 18 departments. That's where we fell down. We have work to do on that.
I think a review of each of the initiatives would demonstrate that the projects have been delivered in an effective way. Will there be room for improvement? I'm absolutely certain. No human endeavour is ever so perfect as not to have scope for improvement.
I think the challenge for us on the costing issue was in fact—and this is part of the reality of the horizontal initiative—that the guidelines are essentially provided by the Treasury Board Secretariat. We were working off that. The Treasury Board Secretariat and ourselves, and frankly the Privy Council Office, have work to do. Or, anyone who is in the position of public safety on another cross-cutting initiative like the beyond the border initiative will have to be clearer about what their expectations are and how those are enforced, so there is clout behind recognizing that's not filling our information requirement, as parliamentarians have identified, or as the Auditor General has identified. That's the kind of thing we need to do, in my view.