Since it was last looked at in 2004, rolling forward, are we seeing similar issues? The issues here have to do with the feedback loop that was being talked about, because sometimes you know we are getting the results of the actual objection process and those lessons learned weren't properly captured. We're seeing a lot of similar elements. I could ask Mr. Goulet to see if he's got additional things to say, but, by and large, it's important that the assessors and the auditors get to know why the decisions were overturned so that things don't happen the same way.
On March 20th, 2017. See this statement in context.