I want to return to the $56 million. I'm not at all satisfied that this has been adequately accounted for in terms of what took place. Clearly I can't get an answer as to why the decision was made, because of previous responses, but I didn't hear even an attempt to give me an answer to my question of the collateral damage, the unintended consequences, of artificially cutting a budget that wasn't adequately replaced through savings. What damage has that done?
