Well, I think I would make a couple of points. It's a very good question. One, as we've indicated, we're going to always want to continue to improve our contracts for maintenance and support. There was a previous government policy on how to do this in 2006 or 2007. It gave us a lot of flexibility, but it did not give us the value for money that it should have. We've now evolved a new form of support contracts we hope to use. This new form gives us the ability to make sure we have the support we need to make sure the equipment is available, while allowing us to control and manage our costs better.
The lesson learned on costing is the full life-cycle costing. That's why we've stood up a defence costing centre and are implementing full life-cycle costing. Performance measurement is still going to be a good challenge for us. We're going to have to take to Treasury Board for approval a performance framework this year. The minister will have to present it and get it approved. Then we're going to have to make sure we can monitor and collect the data to do that.
In monitoring full life-cycle costing, we're still going to have a challenge. If I have a maintenance technician and he's part-time on one piece of equipment and part-time on another piece of equipment, we're going to have to figure out how we're going to monitor and track that, because the Auditor General has asked us to to compare those. I think there's continually going to be lessons learned. There's always going to be improvements we want to make. We're making some good improvements, but we have a lot more work to do and we'd be the first to acknowledge that.