No, I'm saying that they were collecting information on checklists and we felt they were not then using that information to establish enough of an understanding of risk in the international network. In a sense, they had a tool. That was one aspect of it. However, they were not fully utilizing the information they were gathering.
The other issue is that in the same way we were looking at information in GCMS for improper behaviour, there were opportunities for also looking at that information on a regular basis.