That's a great question, Mr. Chair.
On the broad national trade corridors fund across the country, they're all partnership funds. On the broad programs, we would expect something like 3:1 or 4:1 ratios, where $1 of federal money unlocks $3 or $4 of total infrastructure build. Up in the northern and remote communities, we've structured the programs to be more generous in terms of the federal cost sharing, simply because of the tougher economics up there. For example, in ACAP in remote and northern communities, we say minimum 85% cost sharing from the feds. It's the same thing on the national trade corridors fund; we limit it to 50% in the south, but we allow 75% federal funding in the north. We won't get as much leverage, but we'll get some. More important, we'll ensure that where the investments are made is where the owners of the infrastructure in the communities think they should be made, which is a key strategic priority of the program.