It depends on why you're looking at the debt, and that really goes to what measure you want to use. Absolutely, if you're comparing across countries, the IMF calculation is the more appropriate one. It allows us to compare Canada to the United Kingdom, for example, which is a unitary state. We are not, so you should add the provincial levels of government in.
You should also recognize that we include a number of liabilities related to pension obligations and benefit obligations that other countries do not, as well as the fact that we are saving quite a large amount, by international standards, to pay for future pension obligations that other countries are not, for the most part, accumulating.
If you were an international investor, or if you were asking how we stack up vis-à-vis other countries, the IMF measure is absolutely the right measure. As you know, we very much agree with the Auditor General. If you are looking at the federal government's debt situation from a sustainability or a purely financial perspective, we would agree that the net debt is the right number to be using.