Thank you.
I appreciate the comments and thank you.
I came in, in 2009, so for the past almost a decade I've been responding to the recommendations in the previous audit. We take the recommendations of the Auditor General very seriously, and it has helped us in the management of our business.
There is no report here from the Auditor General that we were doing nothing on fraud. It says that the corporation should better define fraud risk, etc. We absolutely agree with that. To answer your question, and I put it back to you, the reason that has been pointed out is fraud detection and prevention is such a priority for the government right now. We monitored all the Charbonneau commission of inquiry. The question from the other member of the committee.... Absolutely, that came to light first and maybe only because it was first exposed in Quebec. That's not to say there aren't issues like that potentially anywhere in the country.
We followed that very closely and have been taking steps from day one on that. Fraud has been on our corporate risk register that I report to the board on every quarter at our meetings, and as a management team we review monthly, and even weekly in our ad hoc meetings, so we have made that a priority.
The Auditor General has said that we can do more on this and be better, and we agree. We're a corporation that's constantly improving our systems. We have a great strategic planning annual process. Fraud detection has been on our agenda for the last nine-plus years, I can assure you, and we're making it better all the time.