Let me make some general comments about where we're going and then I'll ask my colleagues to fill in some detail.
If you look at the initiatives we had under way that were highlighted in the Auditor General's report, many of these initiatives were started well before the auditor's report. For example, the e-procurement system that would allow us to better measure, better quantify the trends in bidding in order to be able to detect fraud was under development and began its implementation almost concurrently with the release of this report. So it's not as if the report came out and then we started to do something. We were aware that you can always do more.
As the volume of contracts has increased over the years under FIIP and now infrastructure 2016, we've had to ramp up to be able to deal with this kind of volume effectively, and having the e-procurement tool is both helpful to manage contracts and helpful to detect fraud.
Also, on the documentation side, if you look at the comments of the Auditor General regarding the loading and organization of documentation for contracts, you will see that we were also already developing a more rigorous and easier to use document management system.
Our ability to address these points, legitimate points that we agree with, that were raised by the auditor had already been identified internally and were already being worked on. I would invite my colleagues perhaps—