Yes, okay.
I was just making the case, Chair, that, again, I've made the argument that the two outstanding issues that exist, the legal matters we have are, without divulging any confidences, the instant case of trying to get the information pre-2015, that remains an outstanding issue. Then there's the overall issue that the Auditor General has been asking for for years, which is a change in language so we don't get into this each time. So far every time we've gotten into it, we've had a one-off resolve with an order in council, but it still leaves more questions because of the detailed nature of the order in council naming certain documents certain things. So we still have an issue in Canada—as proud as we are of our auditing system, and we all crow about having clean audits and everything—right now, we have a serious issue in which the Auditor General is asking for information that he deems is within his legal mandate, and the department is saying they aren't going to give it. That's as far as I can go now because we're in camera arming ourselves with the legalities of all of this, but it is a big deal. The Auditor General is not looking for any cabinet secrets. He doesn't want any of that. He just wants numbers. He wants his analysis.
If you want a chance to say something, I'll let you have it, and then I'm going to move on, if I have time.