I'll go on to another issue. This goes to what my colleague, Chandra, was referring to in terms of the disagreement. There was a very clear disagreement. On page 17, the Auditor General reports that the agency says that administering duties on items valued at less than $200 would result in a net cost to the Canadian government, whereas the Department of Finance then says that increasing the threshold to $200 would have cost the federal government $66 million. This is perplexing because this is a pretty huge gap. On the one hand we have Finance saying if the threshold is increased to $200, it will be a net cost, and on the other hand we have the agency saying that's not the case.
I know the Auditor General has pointed out here that the explanation was that it's a cabinet confidence. I would like to know from the folks at Finance, in what ways did you calculate this amount differently than the agency did?