As my time is passing by, I will get back to that, but let me go back to the report of January 20.
The report identifies serious problems with 58 of the 124 elements analyzed. It also indicates that the situation was so problematic that a date could not be set for implementing nearly 90% of those 58 elements.
How is it that your department chose to pull the trigger even after such a critical report? We are talking about a report that said that the system should not be launched, that nearly half of the elements under analysis posed serious problems, and that the time frame as to when they would be fixed was not known.