I just want to follow up on the number of pay advisers. It's funny that you first started blaming the issue on the pay advisers on November 29, a year ago. However, as of March, April, June, July, and September 2016, none of these times actually mention the pay advisers.
I'm just curious. An entire year went by before you came up this idea of it all being because you laid off the pay advisers as a big issue. It was never mentioned before.
Let me finish.
It never came up in any of the other reports, such as the Gartner report or the S.i. Systems report.
When you read through the whole stack of ATIPs we did, it actually stated in one of the reports that at Miramichi they were ready to go, that they had enough staff. You stated that it's because of the pay advisers. Here we are now, two years later, and we have more pay advisers in Miramichi and throughout the government than we did before we actually started the process.
How confident are you that it is the main issue?