Sure. However, presumably the 200 people you're currently using are crisis-managed and have worked on difficult aspects of the system. They would be ideal candidates to help with future difficult work—things like implementing the 55 new departments and rolling forward the 60 other collective agreements that haven't yet been implemented in the system.
What about future negotiations? Each of these collective agreements is only four years long, so every month over the 48-month period there are, on average, two that need to be reimplemented in the system. Isn't that correct?