Thank you very much to all the witnesses who have appeared here this morning.
I think I'm a little confused around who exactly is responsible for implementing, for making sure gender-based analysis happens. I think we're all agreed that the purpose of GBA+ is to produce better policy right from the get-go. I'm seeing a number of things that to my mind would make this a better case, that it would go back to the educational formation of analysts in terms of just original thinking, when somebody gets an idea to produce a program, around what elements go in there.
I'm a little skeptical about top-ending it, where at the end of all of that process it's, “Oh, wait a minute. We didn't do GBA+. Let's go back again.” It's too late there, but at the same time, somebody needs to call it and say whether or not it's been done.
I'd like to hear a bit from the Auditor General about what you found in the process, then from Status of Women about how you're finding that supporting role—I thought you all were in charge, but it's not the case—and then of course from Privy Council Office and Treasury Board. As a new MP, I'm certainly learning about the chain of command.
The other thing I want to throw in there is that I did the online test last night for fun. I didn't get 100%. I went back and I did it several times. There were a couple of questions there specifically around, as an individual, what are you responsible for? Was it all of it? Was it none of it? I couldn't get to that answer.