Actually, we are using this. We are using the data we have to look at trends, the type of utilization, and prevention versus treatment. We do all of this. What we cannot do, and where I think our partners from the OAG are driving us, is to be able to say how much these services—because they are evidence-based—are improving overall oral health. The data doesn't tell us this, so we need more. We need to bring other data together with this data to be able to say whether, overall, as a result of scaling, the exams that are done, and fluoridation that oral health is improving.
We know that the services we are funding and supporting are increasing the demand, the utilization. These are all good indicators, but in the end, is all this leading to a better oral health outcome? We need a population-level survey, for example, to help us on that front, and we are working on this as well.