That’s a very good question. Let me reassure you in this regard.
Part of our program spending goes to the transportation of medical personnel and equipment, and it is calculated differently. The figures presented in the auditor’s report relate to services and medical procedures.
According to our infrastructure program, when renovating or building facilities for nursing stations in remote communities, for example, a room is often set up for oral care, and there is a dentist's chair.
Some funding will be provided to have local workers, for example, who will be responsible for scheduling appointments, ensuring that clients keep their appointments, and providing local support. There is a little bit of that in the programs, and it's extremely useful.
In fact, one of the truly positive things about the children's oral health initiative is local support. Irregular visits to a professional service outlet have an impact on oral health. We think it is extremely important to have a person from the community there at all times. The person ensures that clients are registered, calls them to confirm their appointments and ensures follow-up at the school, to obtain parental consent for services, for example. In this sense, we do not have many requests for service. We should really ensure a local dynamic, especially in remote communities.