There are a certain number of assets that are foreseen to be demolished and the land naturalized—not many, but there are some. Some are in that category.
Of the assets that are not heritage treasures but are revenue-producing and are part of the fabric of a community, and therefore should keep going, that's part of our leasing portfolio. They have to make a business case for recapitalization. Part of that is what the revenue is versus the...and the business case will usually justify a certain amount of recapitalization.
It's also a client relations issue, and Chandra, I think, would back me up here. We spend a lot of time on client relations, working with our farmers in the greenbelt, and so forth. Almost every case is different, but in each case we try to seek excellence and even to leverage partners, municipalities, and other funding to invest in the assets. I think it would be wrong to think there's a host of decaying, awful assets about to be—