I think that if it's managed properly in terms of dealing with the particular issues you're raising, you can get the best of both worlds, effectively. You can get the insight into what's important from the principal shareholder. I think it is important not to lose sight that, although we create an arm's-length crown corporation to manage issues outside the normal activities of government, it is still an instrument of the government. The principal shareholder is the government, and it often has a point of view that's important for board members to be aware of. It's a very useful tool in that capacity to allow information to be shared with board members.
You then have to watch where the particular issues might be that may be perceived as creating a conflict and try to manage those, perhaps through recusal, but perhaps by other means as well.