Well, I'm sorry if I left that impression. It probably wasn't the best term to use.
What I really wanted to express is that the status of the Chalk River site has significantly improved in terms of the rest of the world understanding it, understanding what its mission is, and recognizing that it is now in the process of being revitalized. It's now playing a significant role on the international stage relative to things like small modular reactors. It's seen as an example of change using the GOCO model. We regularly interface with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, sharing some lessons learned in terms of that.
I misspoke in terms of notoriety. What I meant was that in the most positive way the reputation of CNL has been improved significantly over the last couple of years.