I've certainly observed strong majority governments working with their public accounts committee, and I operated within a minority government on the audit side with the public accounts committee.
The one element that gets complicated is the composition of the members around the public accounts committee table. It stays more balanced, if you will; it makes partisanship less of an issue, because you have more representation around the committee membership table.
Again, I think the same principles apply. It's still the case that the constitution of the House shouldn't influence the behaviour of the committee. I mean, it does, but that's the tricky goal. I will say Lesley and I were sharing examples yesterday. I'm not sure if it was harder for me as the auditor, as a witness or advisor to the committee, when they would have a big argument in the House and then come into the committee and it was all gone away, or when there was something in the House that got carried on into the committee. Both were very difficult for me as a person on the outside sitting in the committee.
To the extent that it can be eliminated, all the better, but I think it works under any constitution of the House.