The question is important, and it is an important conversation, as you said. I think that certainly my reference to the work that has been done is an acknowledgement that people have been working on better equity and inclusion in the public service for many years, a long time. There have been many reports and efforts to identify recommendations and actions that need to be taken. It was meant to acknowledge that work. As the clerk's call to action has pointed out, we have not made the progress that we need to, we have not spent the time looking carefully at our particular processes and systems that do have some level of bias, and we need to understand those.
I'm not in a position, of course, to comment on any cases that are before the courts, and I won't go there. I think that the call to action—