Okay. That's a reasonable question.
I'll repeat myself a little. Clearly, I always try to honour the past directions of an organization. In this case, it's the Department of Finance. But you also have to find ways for those directions or practices to evolve. That's why I understand the reluctance in the past to disclose an amount like that. The intent was to better uphold the important principle of confidentiality in terms of the advice we provide to the government.
In my view, which is consistent with Mr. Marsland's, we are able to disclose the amount without putting that other aspect of our activities at risk. That's why we made the decision to share it with you, in the spirit of transparency.