Coming up with that percentage is a little complicated, so I want to talk about a few things that are in it. It includes all the reports that we will table in the House.
A few years ago we started to table all of our special examinations of Crown corporations so that they would be available if a parliamentary committee wanted to study them. They are available publicly on every Crown's website, but we wanted them to be in one place for Parliament. Those are not often studied, and we considered that. They have been discussed with the board of directors of the Crown corporations. They have an action plan and their internal audit shops and their boards of directors will follow up with the corporations taking those actions. While these examinations they may not be studied in Parliament, they are studied and looked at.
In the case of many of the audit reports, when we issued our results, it looked as if they hadn't been reviewed, as I mentioned in my opening statement; but they were reviewed by the public accounts committee.
There are reports of the commissioner that are referred to the environment committee that are not always studied there. That's where I would encourage any committee across Parliament to study any of our reports. We are always happy to talk about our work, and it doesn't necessarily always have to be studied by the committee that refers to them.