I might turn to Andrew to add some details, but I think I should be able to answer all of your question.
The nature of the breach was that an individual who was an adviser on a financial audit, an academic, released some of the contents of our audit report before it was tabled in the House. As soon as that happened, we did an investigation. We alerted the individual that they were in breach of the confidentiality clause they had agreed to when signing on to become an adviser on one of our audits.
We take any pre-release of our reports very seriously. We believe it's important that they be released to Parliament as a whole, all at once, and that any individual who might provide us with advice or guidance throughout the process needs to respect that need to keep the information embargoed.
I don't know, Andrew, if—