In your opinion, is it sufficient to table reports twice a year? Would you instead like the legislature to allow you to table a smaller number of reports more often?
Every time there are reports tabled by the Auditor General, the attention of all parliamentarians is obviously focused on the whole set of reports. As a result, important information is sometimes missed, whether it is positive or negative. Indeed, people will generally pay little attention to anything positive and focus more on the reports that contain hard-hitting items.
Do you think the Office of the Auditor General should be allowed to table reports in Parliament more often?