I think it would be helpful. I think it reflects the integrity and the robustness of the system and, frankly, the honesty of Canadians —whether they were eligible or ineligible, whether they were moved to a new program or whether they actually in fact rebegan employment—because of the way the system actually worked. Frankly, I think it speaks to how robust the program was.
Also, in terms of the era of digitization, we spoke to that—I know that Mr. Sabia has left—in terms of the way the CRA had to pivot from collecting taxes and funding government services and programs to actually deploying proceeds or benefits to Canadians. How easy or how complex was that pivot? In your view, how does it speaks to future programs, potentially, and to what people speak to, such as a digital ID? Just how complex was that pivot for the CRA?