Thank you for the opportunity to continue to expand on the previous member's question.
He was referring to paragraph 6.57, I think, within our audit report. I think it's hard to draw the analogy that because there were some blocked payments, we could then draw a conclusion based on the entire population when only a small percentage were actually ineligible recipients. This group was a group of what we'll say are our “suspicious” accounts. The Canada Revenue Agency has a lot of data, and they use some of that data to inform risk assessments and decisions. They flagged these as potential files that were of a suspicious nature for many reasons.
I don't think it's appropriate to make the analogy that all of the payments would be like that. I think it's important to acknowledge that there are likely ineligible applicants and that there are probably intentionally misrepresented applications—