There are several parts to the question from the honourable member.
I don't want to overly interpret the Auditor General, but she's recognized the progress we have made and pointed out the significant gaps and things we have to do.
On the question of the activities that lead to better security outcomes, we have made a lot of progress and done a lot of work to use information and data from multiple sources to guide actions, including oversight, including regulatory standards and inspections and audits to improve security outcomes, and we think we've made progress there.
About 10 minutes ago the Auditor General, I think, clearly and articulately stated the challenge before us and where we have more work to do, based on her recommendations of mapping and figuring out in an analytical way the relationship among specific aspects of the SMS program and safety outcomes, but, more importantly, everything we're doing. It goes back to this point that where we're being criticized and challenged, we're also being guided in key steps we can take to create a higher-performing safety system, and we are committed to deliver actions that follow up and respond to her recommendations in a timely manner.
We have shared details of the action plan with the committee. We're trying to establish clear time bounds for specific activities. We believe by the end of 2021, we will have made some significant progress. We will not be done, because the challenge the Auditor General has put before us will take us a while to meet completely, but we think we can make significant progress in beginning to assess effectiveness, even by the end of this coming year.