Okay.
The division is made and it's clear, given the vessels. Irving Shipbuilding Inc. is working with the Department of National Defence, while Seaspan is working with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Two years ago, I believe, the contract to build a sixth Arctic and offshore patrol ship, or AOPS, was given to Irving. The original contract was for five ships. A sixth ship was added at twice the price. This means that Irving is being paid $800 million instead of $400 million. The surplus was used to give money to Irving, because its managers said that there was an issue and that the company couldn't lose employees.
In this situation, is the Department of National Defence responsible for managing the Irving Shipbuilding Inc. issue or is another department responsible for doing so? Should the Department of National Defence cover the additional costs resulting from a company's issues and include them in its budget?
My question is for Jody Thomas.