Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Commissioner, I'll get your response on this first, and then if Health Canada wants to respond, as well, you guys are free to do that.
One thing I find really interesting is a bit of a theme throughout the report as follows. The end of paragraph 2.6 reads:
However, the primary responsibility for the safety and efficacy of products and manufacturing sites rests with the industry.
We start seeing other stats and information, like in paragraph 2.32, which reads:
...88% of these products were advertised with misleading product information. Also, 56% of the products we examined were marketed with misleading label information...
A lot of these products must have a Health Canada stamp of approval on them. Am I correct in saying that?
To see that there's such a discrepancy between their advertised uses and what they actually accomplish despite having a Health Canada stamp of approval on them.... Are there any concerns from the department and from the commissioner on that?
If the commissioner wants, he can go first.