Yes, on a point of order, this is an important motion to discuss. Notice was not provided for it. I don't think it meets the “matter at hand” requirements. We are undertaking a study at present of the Auditor General's report. We have the Auditor General and senior officials, who have come before us to testify on that. A look at historical contracts from one of the same companies—not even the same but some of the principals involved in the present company—is a very different subject.
On February 20th, 2024. See this statement in context.