Under the changes that we've made now, we would have to have a much stronger justification, under the criteria in the Treasury Board framework, for using a non-competitive contract. That would need to be done first. I think there will be a lot more due diligence in terms of the justification and the articulation of the reason why there is a need to use a non-competitive contract.
With respect to the issuance of task authorizations, we will need to have a much clearer understanding of what the overall project objectives are and what the activities are. The task authorizations will have to be very specific to what those activities are.
The other thing we're looking at is time-limiting the contract. A big part of what we found in the weaknesses here is that where there were task authorizations, the descriptions were general, which allowed too much flexibility. This is actually trying to have clear articulation of those task authorizations, which will take away that flexibility, so you know at the outset what resources are going to work on what types of activities. We can then assess whether those activities were delivered and we can ultimately assess the price that was paid to deliver those activities.