That's essentially what I alluded to in the first answer. That is absolutely something we're considering doing—not just specific to ArriveCAN, but on a much broader scale—to determine how prevalent the practice is.
As I mentioned at the OGGO committee, the fact that it has a name is indicative that it's a troubling practice. I have to admit that upon reconsideration, I'm even more troubled by the 76%. It's something I'd happily discuss in further answers.