Thank you very much.
I'm going to turn now to Mr. Hayes and the Office of the Auditor General.
At a previous meeting, I noted the Auditor General's report mentioned that CBSA had added a firm to a task authorization under GC Strategies rather than contracting the firm directly. When I asked if you knew who that firm was, you said at the time you didn't. Then you provided me with the answer at the very end of the meeting, and I think KPMG was the firm that had been added to a task authorization form of GC Strategies.
Since this company was not approached to do the work and was added to a task authorization form to become a subcontractor for GC Strategies, were you able to determine the value for money of their work? I'm suspecting maybe not because they were a subcontractor. Can you comment on whether or not it would have been cheaper for CBSA to contract this firm directly rather than making them a subcontractor of GC Strategies? Doesn't that have the appearance of providing GC Strategies with an additional cut?