There is no pre-established threshold. Every allegation must be examined with a view to establishing its basis and determining whether there are facts to support it. Sometimes, when there is only one allegation, we will be able to confirm it with evidence.
For example, in the case of the other security clearance suspension that took place, we were informed that a supplier's chief executive had a job while he was the chief executive officer of the company. That involved a very quick verification. We had confirmation of dual employment. Because of other information in the file, we were automatically able to confirm that the chief executive was in non-compliance with the contract security program and we were able to suspend him very quickly.
With respect to GC Strategies, a number of allegations have been raised. The sum of the allegations that were proven resulted in the chief executive being found in non-compliance and having his security clearance suspended.