Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll just pick up on the issue of indigenous procurement.
Dalian's identity as an indigenous company as part of the set-aside for indigenous procurement is obviously absurd and a manipulation of the intention of the policy. The intention of the policy, presumably, is to give opportunities to indigenous Canadians to work in jobs that flow from government procurement. However, this was a company that simply received contracts and subcontracted them, taking a cut along the way. There were no opportunities created for indigenous people as a result of this.
You mentioned a registry or a list of indigenous companies that are used when considering this 5% set-aside. What percentage of those companies actually create jobs for indigenous people in Canada?