Just as a point of clarification on exhibit 2.4, I think a better way to look at it would be to look at the variation between 5.6% and 6.5% in terms of housing needing to be replaced. Those houses are beyond the point where undertaking repairs would be economically feasible and would allow people to continue to live in the homes. The 20.8% to 19.7% change reflects housing in need of major repair. Those houses can still be lived in, but they need major repairs to roofs, flooring or foundations. It doesn't make sense to compare them. They're two different things.
However, there's a larger issue of why you don't see an improvement, perhaps. Even though, for example, over 11,000 new houses were built or were in the process of being built in the period in which we undertook our audit, as time goes by, houses that are in need of major repairs but are not repaired can no longer be lived in.
There are a bunch of different things happening that lead to the trends you see in our report.