We found that they used a lot of data over many sources and were well informed as they designed the calls.
This program so far has been rolled out with seven different calls, and each call targeted a specific need, whether it was seen as a bottleneck in transportation corridors or a gap when it comes to making sure that infrastructure is climate-resilient. They did a good job of having evidence to support the calls, and then even having open and transparent criteria to select the recipients who would be eligible for the program. It was well designed and well informed by data, which is different from what we're seeing in our indigenous reports, where data is often not gathered and decisions aren't well informed. However, in the corridors it was a great example of well-informed decision-making.