There were a number of different questions in there.
We do not have details about other countries, but we do understand there were also significant costs involved in managing travellers across borders in other countries, in particular in the Border Five and the European Union.
I want to come back to the national security exemption letter.
I recognize that I did sign that in June of 2020. That was at the request of PSPC, to allow them to put in place the second contract with GC Strategies. They had already done the first contract with GC Strategies, I think in March, and they needed to do a second contract. As I referenced at the OGGO committee last week, we identified a supplier that had successfully implemented a modern tool for risk assessment. As I identified last week, that was a company called Lixar.
What I have learned since last week is that Lixar was actually working in a strategic partnership with GC Strategies, so I accept that the testimony of the PSPC deputy minister was correct in that this letter directly led to the second contract with GC Strategies. That is what the national security letter was used for. Only one contract was let under that national security exemption letter; the others were let under the PHAC-originated national security exemption letter.