Thank you.
I am trying to stay out of this as much as possible.
Mrs. Shanahan, it's not uncommon for committees to have all kinds of schedules and work plans, but if a motion comes up and is passed, that will obviously change a work plan that was set. That's the reality of this and any motion.
I certainly don't believe that yesterday's motion suggests that members from the various political parties can't bring forward motions for this committee, in particular, to study because something is thought to be an issue. I think it would set a very dangerous precedent if that right was withdrawn. Therefore, as chair, if this motion passes, I will view it as a direction from the committee.
Again, I don't believe yesterday's motion ever envisioned that consensus should mean unanimity on anything; rather, it's an ability to structure witnesses...from all the political parties. In fact, I think it was you, Mrs. Shanahan, who said this is not about a veto; this is just about greater input.
On that, I'm going to step back. Again, this motion is certainly in order, given the Standing Orders.
Mr. Desjarlais, you have the floor.