I'll take a first crack at it, and see if Jo Ann or Mélanie might want to add something.
What we were looking for was whether they knew they were, first, meeting the requirements of the agreements. What we found was that, in most cases, the RCMP was unable to tell us whether a police officer had spent 100% of their time dedicated to the community, as they were supposed to. In the detachments that we looked at, only 38% could tell us they were really dedicating their time to a culturally appropriate approach to policing services.
When it came to Public Safety, I would outline a few things. The first is that it wasn't monitoring how the RCMP was spending those funds, and it wasn't really gathering data on the effectiveness. It was gathering response rates and so on, which is really the traditional way to look at policing—how many calls you answered and so on—versus whether they were actually in the community, building trust and different relationships.
Do either of you want to add anything to that?