I was following along for a while trying to pick that up.
As I often argue here, when it comes to asking for the production of copies of numerous documents, we don't know exactly what that looks like. Is it a summary sheet like this? Is it a pile like that? We don't know how they're filed or how they're kept.
In this committee, it is appreciated when we can talk about motions beforehand. We've done that in the past and we can come to ground on what should be a common purpose here, which is transparency and looking to better serve the Canadian public.
These documents would have to be translated. I don't know what that looks like. I don't know if Mr. Kurek knows what that looks like. We don't have Mr. Nater here, so I don't know if he was able to make some determination on that as well. We didn't look at it on our side since we didn't think we were dealing with the number of documents that we have to deal with.
Just looking at colleagues, I'm looking for a change in the number of days. It would be to change, in paragraph (f)(i), “21 days”, to “60 days”. In paragraph (f)(ii), it's to change the “35 days” to “60 days”.
I think that gives the public service a little bit more time. Given our experience with days being moved around, I can suggest some more formal wording.
I move the amendment that we remove (i) and (ii) and replace—