That analysis has been done and it has guided us.
It's where there might have been bottlenecks, supply chain constraints, so we could really look at how we target those specific areas so that we could really show where we were making recommendations to address the specific issues.
The criterion we use to evaluate all proposals is published in a public guide for the benefit of applicants. We use the same grid and the same guide for project evaluation.
I think we made a mistake when making adjustments after the national committee meeting. We did not properly document the reasons why we made slight adjustments in the score given to such a project.
This is a recommendation we accept. I think this is an area where we can do better to show how, through calibration exercises, we've adjusted evaluation scores through that exercise.