Okay.
Help me with this, because I have a hard time reconciling the evidence your partner, Mr. Hartaj Nijjar, gave on the last occasion and your evidence today with respect to a very key issue.
My colleague Mr. Nater used the phrase “flim-flammed”. You weren't familiar with that phrase. It could be “hoodwinked”. It could be “snowed”. It could be “lied to”. You certainly didn't know is what I understand. They offered no IT services whatsoever. They were strictly a middleman connecting the Government of Canada with professionals.
You're saying that you didn't know that and Mr. Firth didn't volunteer that information. That's what you're telling us today. Is that correct?