You're asking me to remember a lot of specifics. I'm going to see if Mathieu wants to join in here.
I would say, overall, that it's about making sure, when the awarding of public funds is done, that it follows the structure, the governance structure, that was agreed to between the federal government and the foundation. It's clearly set out in the contribution agreements between the government and the foundation, and the board really failed to comply with those requirements. They created a stream that, we believe, doesn't even meet the mandate of the foundation, which were some of the contracts that we believe received funds in an ineligible way.
It's about going back to basics and following that contribution agreement.
Mathieu, do you want to add something?