I appreciate that response.
It highlights my next point, which is second to the new kind of colonialism that the state is undertaking today. It's this reconciliation-first model that, on the front of it, especially if you go to the west coast—and I'm sure you have—with their tradition of the transformation mask.... You see a beautiful mask. It's welcoming in some ways, but then when the mask opens and the raven's mouth is bared, you see what it truly is. It's a shockingly disturbing sight.
It's a sight that would use, for example, compensation tools that were largely met because first nations had to force the government to court in order to get that compensation. It's truly disturbing. Many of the agreements—nearly all of the modern agreements your government has signed—are largely liability agreements. They seek to devolve the liability of the federal government for housing, water and the jurisdiction of families to indigenous people.
You mentioned the care and control. That's the part where the care and control piece is very difficult. In the court of law, where the government loses 99% of its court cases on liability issues, we see the government respond to those liability issues by presenting agreements that, on the face of it, look really good. However, deep down within them, if you read those agreements, it's a transfer of liability, care and control.
When you say care and control, you also mean liability. Is that correct?