On that point, you say “regular evaluations”, but the audit spoke particularly about the fact that there were several times that departmental plans, which are required under the act, simply didn't have the satisfactory information that would make your decision-making at ISED more accountable.
It seems to me that there's a situation of wilful ignorance and that there is a lack of true accountability, because they were supplying annual reports that really had no information, which has ultimately led to the charge of guilt that you, by your own admission, were relying on minutes.
That shows me that the level of information that the ministry was getting was not sufficient. Is that correct?