I'd like to provide a bit of clarity to the figures. There were 96 cases of conflict of interest that we believed were managed well and where board members recused themselves from the vote. Those were linked to $259 million in funding. Then there were 90 cases, as we noted in the audit, where there were conflicts of interest that were not properly managed and where individuals who had declared a conflict of interest continued to be involved in the discussion and then vote. Those were linked to $76 million of funding.
You can't just add the two up because some of the funding appears in both buckets. It isn't just a case of adding the two numbers, but it represents a total of $319 million.